![ES2486dc | Powerful and cost-efficient Intel® Xeon® D based Enterprise ZFS NAS, optimized for inline deduplication and all-flash applications | QNAP (US) ES2486dc | Powerful and cost-efficient Intel® Xeon® D based Enterprise ZFS NAS, optimized for inline deduplication and all-flash applications | QNAP (US)](https://www.qnap.com/uploads/images/product/es2486dc/feature.png?v=ed34b6684c89eb1959f3424a9b2b1789)
ES2486dc | Powerful and cost-efficient Intel® Xeon® D based Enterprise ZFS NAS, optimized for inline deduplication and all-flash applications | QNAP (US)
![Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would](https://i.redd.it/why-does-zfs-calculator-estimate-68tb-of-usable-storage-for-v0-lrnskknm9ona1.png?width=2247&format=png&auto=webp&s=15cea2e3feba473e5056d21e2128d32b946721b8)
Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would
![Trying to understand ZFS raidz with different size disks, how is this possible? Any drawbacks? : r/zfs Trying to understand ZFS raidz with different size disks, how is this possible? Any drawbacks? : r/zfs](https://i.redd.it/d6c5714kkcu31.png)
Trying to understand ZFS raidz with different size disks, how is this possible? Any drawbacks? : r/zfs
ZFS RAID Calculator v7.1 - Partner Version - MacOSX Compatible | PDF | Hard Disk Drive | Solid State Drive
![Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would](https://i.redd.it/why-does-zfs-calculator-estimate-68tb-of-usable-storage-for-v0-h6w0mcsk9ona1.png?width=2249&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d2026108d43787fe9499a829e71f939b04f0d2f)
Why does ZFS calculator estimate 68TB of usable storage for 8x 16TB and 8x 20TB array configurations? If it's much cheaper to go 8x 16TB for the same usable storage, what would
![TrueNAS ZFS VDEV Pool Design Explained: RAIDZ RAIDZ2 RAIDZ3 Capacity, Integrity, and Performance. - YouTube TrueNAS ZFS VDEV Pool Design Explained: RAIDZ RAIDZ2 RAIDZ3 Capacity, Integrity, and Performance. - YouTube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-AnkHc7N0zM/mqdefault.jpg)